Sunday, October 2, 2011

Vancouver's Insite drug injection clinic will stay open

Vancouver's controversial Insite clinic can stay open, the Supreme Court said Friday in a landmark ruling.

In a unanimous decision, the court ruled that not allowing the clinic to operate under an exemption from drug laws would be a violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The court ordered the federal minister of health to grant an immediate exemption to allow Insite to operate.

"Insite saves lives. Its benefits have been proven. There has been no discernible negative impact on the public safety and health objectives of Canada during its eight years of operation," the ruling said, written by Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin.

If Insite wasn't allowed to operate it would prevent injection drug users from accessing the health services offered at the facility, threatening their health and their lives, the ruling said. Withdrawing the exemption would even undermine the purpose of the federal drug law, which includes public health and safety, the court said.

The Supreme Court said that if the health minister, currently Leona Aglukkaq, receives applications for more exemptions, she must continue to exercise her discretion and aim to strike a balance between charter rights and protecting public health and safety.

Where there is no evidence that a supervised injection site would have a negative impact on public safety, the minister "should generally grant an exemption," the court said.

The Conservative government is opposed to the Insite operation, and when it came to power it dropped harm reduction from the national anti-drug strategy. Aglukkaq said Friday the government's investments are targeted at prevention and treatment.

"Although we are disappointed with the Supreme Court of Canada's decision today, we will comply," Aglukkaq said in question period. "We believe that the system should be focused on preventing people from becoming drug addicts."

Aglukkaq said the government planned on reviewing the decision.

While the ruling is a victory for Insite, the Supreme Court said it "is not a licence for injection drug users to possess drugs wherever and whenever they wish."

"Nor is it an invitation for anyone who so chooses to open a facility for drug use under the banner of a 'safe injection facility,'" said the court.

Supporters of Insite immediately celebrated their victory and expressed relief over the decision.

"This has been the most incredible battle," NDP MP Libby Davies said at the court in Ottawa minutes after the decision. She said Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government has been opposed to Insite based on partisan and ideological principles and never recognized its benefits. It saves lives, she said.

"The Conservative government has been relentless in their opposition, so today's decision by the court just feels like an incredible victory. It feels like a great day," she said. Insite is in her riding and she said she was thinking of her constituents who use the clinic.

Davies was at the court in Ottawa with Dean Wilson, one of her constituents who used the clinic and helped launch the original court case. A former heroin addict who has been clean for two years, he said he supports more clinics like Insite in other cities, but only if it's right for that community. The floodgates shouldn't necessarily open because of the ruling, he said.

"You need the nurses on side, you need the city on side, you need the local police department on side," the 55-year-old said.

Wilson said he wants to offer an olive branch to the federal government so that all sides can work together to support what he called a gold standard in health services.

In Vancouver a large crowd of supporters at the supervised drug injection site on East Hastings Street in the city's troubled Downtown Eastside site burst into cheers after learning of the ruling on Friday morning.

Joe Arvay, the lawyer who fought the federal government and won, was one of the crowd of health officials, social activists and Downtown Eastside residents.

"Obviously great happiness, great relief — we were nervous. It could have gone the other way," said Arvay.

Dr. Julio Montaner of the B.C. Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS said the decision sends a strong message that addiction is a medical condition, and the charter rights of Insite's clients trump the federal Conservative government's wish to shut the facility down.

"Mr. Harper, you had an opportunity to do the right thing. You chose not to do it for whatever ideological or moral restraints you are operating under. The time has now come for you to move on, and accept the rulings of the court," said Montaner.

Dr. Patricia Daly, the public health officer for Vancouver Coastal Health, said the decision by the top court should finally put to rest the debate over whether Insite is safe.

"For those who doubt it, I have to say during my 20 years in public health I have never seen more evidence supporting a public health practice as we have had published around Insite," said Daly.

"I don't think that there is any doubt in the medical community and in the public health community that this service works and it is evidence-based," said Daly.

Dr. Evan Wood with the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, was also on hand to celebrate the decision.

"I think on a personal level there's a degree of happiness with the decision, to say the least, just because we've seen improvements in the health of so many of our patients. And we're aware of the research that programs like Insite save tax dollars," said Wood.

"In terms of the public disorder and public injecting, those issues obviously would have gotten a lot worse if it had to close," he said.

Montaner noted the federal government didn't lose everything in this case when the high court ruled in favour of Ottawa on a jurisdictional issue, saying it has jurisdiction over health-care delivery at Insite.

But he did not anticipate that would prevent any other province or regional health authority from setting up its own supervised injection facility.

Bernie Pauly with the School of Nursing at UVic said the question of jurisdiction will still need some parsing by lawyers. But she said this decision is a boost for those who would like to see a similar facility in Victoria.

"Absolutely, the obstacles are removed, and we have our city, our health authority, are all in support of harm reduction, and so it means we have to move forward. There is no reason not to," said Pauly.

B.C.'s Health Minister Michael de Jong called the ruling "a wise and humane ruling by a unanimous bench."

"Today's ruling will allow the doctors, nurses and staff at Insite to continue to deliver care in a safe environment with a stable future," said de Jong.

Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson issued a statement applauding the decision.

“I am very pleased to see today’s ruling from the Supreme Court of Canada in favour of Insite," said Robertson.

“Addiction is a health issue, not a criminal issue. Research, and now the law, confirms our position that safe injection sites such as InSite perform an important health-care role in the lives of people living with chronic addiction-related problems," said Robertson.

Health groups, including the Canadian Medical Association and the Canadian Public Health Association, also applauded the decision.

Insite, supported by the City of Vancouver and the B.C. government, provides sanitary conditions for addicts while they inject drugs, medical supervision to help monitor for overdoses, clean needles and counselling for those seeking rehabilitation.

The clinic does not supply any drugs.

Insite has supervised more than one million injections, according to the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, and there has never been a death at the facility. The health authority says there have been more than 1,400 overdoses and that medical staff were able to intervene successfully in all cases.

A study published in the British medical journal The Lancet found that overdose deaths had declined by 35 per cent in the area of Insite, on Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside, since the clinic had opened, compared to a nine per cent drop in overdoses city-wide.

The B.C. Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS has said that since Insite opened, there's been a 30 per cent increase in the number of addicts who enter detox.

Other Canadian cities, such as Victoria and Toronto, have said they want to open their own safe-injection clinics, modelled on Insite.

Insite was granted a three-year exemption from the possession and trafficking provisions of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act when it first opened its doors in 2003.

It was granted two extensions but the Conservative government made it clear in 2008 that it did not support another exemption, and court proceedings were launched to try to save the clinic. Lawyers for the federal ministry argued that the government should not be in the business of facilitating illegal drug use.

The federal health minister at the time was Tony Clement, now Treasury Board president, and the Supreme Court agreed with lower court decisions that found his decision to withdraw the exemption violates Section seven of the charter because it contravenes the principle of fundamental justice.

DV.load('http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/254069-ruling-canada-v-phs-community-services-society.js', { width: 458, height: 600, sidebar: false, container: "#DV-viewer-254069-ruling-canada-v-phs-community-services-society" });With files from the CBC's Rik Jespersen and The Canadian Press Accessibility Links

View the original article here

Friday, September 9, 2011

McDonald's to show calories on UK menus

McDonald`s restaurants in Britain are showing the calorie count for each item on the menu. McDonald`s restaurants in Britain are showing the calorie count for each item on the menu. Ed Ou/AP

More than 1,000 McDonald's restaurants in Britain are displaying the calorie count of each fast food item on their menus as part of a government-led program to fight obesity.

McDonald's said the counts will be displayed on wall-mounted menu boards from Sept. 4 in all of its 1,200 U.K. restaurants.

The chain is one of several food companies partnering with the British Department of Health to encourage customers to adopt a healthier diet. It has also promised to remove artificial trans fats from its products, although it did not sign up to a salt reduction pledge.

McDonald's is already displaying calorie menu boards in New York City.

Other chains that have signed up to the British calorie display program include KFC, Pizza Hut and Starbucks.

Accessibility Links

View the original article here

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Most Nunavut toddlers lack healthy diet: studies

More than half of Nunavut's Inuit preschool-aged children are lacking adequate daily nutrition, a new pair of studies suggests.

Research published this month in the Journal of Nutrition and the International Journal of Circumpolar Health showed that 56 per cent of Nunavut Inuit households with a young child were considered "child food insecure" in a dietary health survey.

The surveys, conducted in 16 Nunavut communities in 2007-08, also showed that seven out of 10 households with a child between the ages of three and five were "food insecure".

Child food insecurity rates in the survey sample were 10 times higher than national figures reported in the Canadian Community Health Survey, in which about five per cent of households were considered child food insecure.

Dr. Grace Egeland, a McGill University associate professor in the school of dietetics and human nutrition, was the lead author for both papers.

The data should be used to help those characterized as food insecure plan how to improve their diets, she says.

"What's happening is that these stressors in the communities are having an impact on nutritional status, and over the long term, we would anticipate it would have implications on health," Egeland said.

"These are subtle changes in diet that over the long term can have negative consequences."

Food insecurity has been associated with lower education, household income and social assistance, according to Egeland.

The information for both reports was gathered as part of an Inuit Health Survey for International Polar Year.

Data from 1,901 households were considered in the Journal of Nutrition report. The other report, which focused more on preschoolers' dietary characteristics, considered data collected from 388 participants.

The International Journal of Circumpolar Health report concludes that both traditional foods and foods purchased from markets are needed in order for children to be considered food secure.

"Support systems and dietary interventions for families with young children are needed," the report adds.

Accessibility Links

View the original article here

Montreal heart researcher stripped of status

A prominent researcher with the Montreal Heart Institute has been stripped of his lab, privileges and status following an investigation into scientific misconduct.

The institute launched an investigation earlier this year after two studies by Dr. Zhiguo Wang were retracted from prominent scientific journals.

Those studies, conducted in 2007 and 2008, explored irregular heart rhythms. The research was done at the cellular level and did not involve patients.

Dr. Zhiguo WangDr. Zhiguo Wang At the time, Wang blamed the error on a mix-up of images used to illustrate the data. He said the research itself was solid and had been reproduced.

On Friday, the Montreal Heart Institute (MHI) said its investigation found Wang “deviated from MHI’s ethical standards of proper scientific conduct and his responsibilities as a researcher.”

Dr. Jean-Claude Tardif, director of the MHI Research Centre, said the hospital had concerns with how images used in the research were manipulated -- and that it must enforce strict scientific standards.

Wang has been stripped of his privileges at the institute and his lab has been closed.

MHI also requested retractions of three additional published articles, but did not disclose any further details of its investigation.

Wang could not be reached for comment Friday.

The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) funded one of the studies retracted earlier this year. The other was funded by the Canadian Diabetes Association.

CIHR said it has frozen Wang's funding.

They're also considering additional measures, which could include barring the researcher from applying for future grants.

Based on the MIH findings, the Canadian Diabetes Association said Wang is no longer eligible for their grants.

with files from Canadian Press Accessibility Links

View the original article here

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Banned e-cigarettes on sale in Regina stores

Electronic cigarettes are illegal and unreliable as a quit-smoking tool, according to Health Canada, but they’re still easy to buy in Regina stores.

The cigarettes, commonly called e-cigarettes, contain cartridges of flavoured liquid that is vapourized and inhaled. They're marketed as an alternative to smoking tobacco.

They’re available online, although Health Canada and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which regulate the cigarettes as drugs, have not approved them for sale.

In Regina, smoke shop owner Ashok Brahmania says he sells about 15 e-cigarette kits a week. He also say he’s been assured they’re legal.

“It has to be approved by Health Canada, and it seems to me I asked our supplier,” he said. “This one is approved by Health Canada.”

In fact, Health Canada says it doesn’t approve any form of electronic cigarette for sale in Canada. And there is no proof e-cigarettes help smokers give up tobacco, the department says.

Janice Burgess of Regina, who helps people quit smoking, says not enough research has been done on electronic cigarettes. She worries the vapour is a risk to others, just as second-hand tobacco smoke is.

“People around the person using the e-cigarette will be exposed to whatever is in the liquid cartridge,” she said.

Accessibility Links

View the original article here

Four confirmed West Nile cases in Que.

The number of reported human cases of the West Nile virus in Quebec is now up to four.

That's the most human cases than the province has seen in the last six years.

In all confirmed cases, the infection was found when the patients donated blood. They were all reported in August.

Dr. Horacio Arruda of the province’s public health department said the recent cases shouldn't be cause for panic.

This is the time of year when human cases typically start to emerge.

"It just reminds us that this disease exists it can exist again so be careful, especially if you are in the risk groups," he said.

Authorities say all the cases are in southwestern Quebec, including the greater Montreal area.

Humans become infected with West Nile when they are bitten by a disease-carrying mosquito.

While many infected people suffer only mild, flu-like symptoms, people with weakened immune systems are at greater risk for developing more serious health effects like meningitis and encephalitis.

According to the Public Health Agency of Canada, the first reported human cases of West Nile in this country were in 2002.

The following year, there were 1,400 human cases reported.

The annual numbers have dropped significantly since that time.

with files from Canadian Press Accessibility Links

View the original article here

Fewer antibiotics prescribed to kids

The push to get pediatricians to stop prescribing antibiotics for the wrong illnesses is paying off a bit, a new U.S. government report found.

Since the early 1990s, there's been a 10 per cent drop in prescription rates for antibiotics for kids 14 and younger, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Thursday.

Antibiotics are often used — but don't work — against viral illnesses like colds and flu. Antibiotics fight infections caused by bacteria. Misuse can lead to antibiotic resistance.

Experts say doctors inappropriately prescribe antibiotics more than 50 per cent of the time, and more often with respiratory infections.

The CDC found larger declines — about 25 per cent — in how often doctors used antibiotics against sore throats, colds and some other upper respiratory infections. But there was no significant change in how often they prescribed the drugs for ear infection, bronchitis and sinusitis.

The new findings represent progress, but also suggest that doctors are still prescribing antibiotics too often, said Dr. Lauri Hicks, a CDC epidemiologist who worked on the study.

"The bad news is we still have a long way to go," she said.

The CDC study was the government's first look at the issue in about a decade. It was based on an annual survey of doctors' offices, and compared rates from 1993-1994 to 2007-2008.

The improvement could be partly driven by rapid diagnostic tests that help doctors pinpoint whether a sore throat is caused by a virus or strep bacteria, CDC researchers said. The study also found fewer parents took their kids to doctors for upper respiratory infections, which could be thanks to a vaccine against pneumococcal bacteria that became available in 2000.

A public health campaign about antibiotics may have also had some impact, CDC officials said.

Doctors have not always followed recommendations to cut back on antibiotics, partly because of pressure from parents, said Dr. Kenneth Bromberg, chairman of pediatrics at the Brooklyn Hospital Center in New York.

Moms and dads who have been up with sick, screaming infants in the middle of the night tend to expect more from a doctor than advice to keep an eye on the problem. Often, they want antibiotics, and may not stop at one doctor to get them, he said.

"In this new age of consumerism, they will go somewhere else and get what they want," Bromberg said.

The taxing nature of ear infections may be why the CDC didn't find a decrease in the antibiotic prescribing rate for that problem, he added.

Accessibility Links

View the original article here